During her exam he was able to disguise very inappropriate touch as a form of treatment and do it with her mom in the room, not realizing what was going on. This went on for over a year, escalating in nature. At the time, the reputation of Larry as the premier sports doctor for USA gymnastics, as well as a teacher of other physicians at Michigan State University, made it seem impossible to suggest he may be guilty of this evil. Due to the climate of victim-blaming, Rachael and her mother had to wait to see if an opportunity to speak out ever presented itself.
In the meantime, Rachael articulates so well the fallout of being a sexual assault survivor. She describes a heightened state of awareness and fear in public places. A fear of men standing behind her, even in a fast-food line. The inability to verbalize what had happened to her, making it impossible to consider going to see a mental health professional. With her family’s support she attempted to process her feelings through journaling and prayer. This part of the book is, I think, the most enlightening to readers who have not been a victim of abuse. The physiological changes, the emotions, and the way memories, nightmares, and fears resurface time after time for the rest of a survivor’s life is something we need to understand more in order to truly support those we come in contact with who are survivors. She explains every cultural bias against victims, point by point, making it easier to see how these biases are played out around us when we don’t even realize it.
For Rachael, as a person of strong Christian faith, her interactions with her church are also worth learning from. She describes sitting in Sunday School and discussing stories like Bathsheba and Dinah and the messages that can be transmitted to children about issues of sexual assault. If you grew up in church, like I did, it is easy to be desensitized to the horror of these stories. But when you think about them from the perspective of a survivor, it is easier to look at the messages we are often sending our children when we teach these stories, including when inappropriate comments are made by other students and not addressed by the teacher. They are a part of the Word of God and therefore have value in teaching. But it is so helpful to listen to the point of view of a survivor before discussing these issues, to help us avoid the pitfalls of our cultural biases.
Some of the messages of this book that translate to a better understanding of being trauma informed are these: Survivors need as many choices as possible as they deal with the aftermath or reporting of their abuse. Choice is a form of control and abuse always represents a loss of control for the victim. In order to recover, find their voice, and retake control of their lives, it is important to give them as many choices as possible when telling their story or seeking help. (I do want to be sure to say that when the victim is a minor at the time of disclosure, there is no choice in reporting for any adult who becomes aware of the abuse or the victim discloses to. Choices should be given when possible in who they talk to, the setting, who is present, etc. Whether or not it is reported to law enforcement or child protective services, is not a choice. It must be done.)
Something else it’s important to remember for being trauma informed is that a survivor’s perception of safety is more important than leadership’s perception of the safety of their organization. This can be called Felt Safety. If you are in leadership – a teacher, pastor, CEO – and you feel your organization is a safe place, both preventing abuse and open to receiving a disclosure of abuse about a leader or staff member and able to follow best practices in reporting and supporting the victim while investigating the claim, your opinion is secondary to whether a survivor feels safe enough to come forward in your organization. When we discuss outside instances of abuse whether in the news, books, movies, or religious texts, we are sending messages to survivors about how safe they would be discussing their abuse in our presence.
Another message that she grapples with and expresses so well is that God loves justice just as much as He loves forgiveness. The Bible teaches that vengeance belongs to Him, and there will be an eternal judgement for the evil we commit. Whether that justice is meted out in our lifetime or after life is not always in our control. But when it can be meted out by our courts, the message that sends to survivors is important. When considering the punishment for abuse, the sentence reflects the worth of the victim. That is the meaning of the book title, What is a girl worth? The answer should be everything. The punishment for victimizing the innocent should be the maximum the law allows. When we try to minimize or mitigate the evildoing of an abuser, we diminish the perfection and beauty of the goodness of God.
The story of Rachael Denhollander, to me, is an Esther story. Esther is told to use her position in a time of crisis, for "who knows but that you have come to your royal position for such a time as this?" Esther 4:14. Rachael developed the gifts God had given her which included an analytical mind and the ability to become an attorney, her supportive family, and her faith. With these three things she became the one person who could bring a police report against Larry Nassar in such a way that she could withstand the institutional push-back from Michigan State University, and get her story out into the public sector where other survivors could see it and join her in coming forward. Without the support from family and personal faith, as well as a few perfectly placed individuals who also sought truth, including a reporter, a detective, and a prosecutor, her story would not have been able to pierce the public arena and bring the judgement of our courts down on Larry Nassar.
I hope that others will take this opportunity to look at the institutions we are a part of, whether they be schools, churches, clubs, corporations or other spheres, for how we can make sure they are as prepared as they can be to both protect the innocent and to be a safe place for victims to disclose their abuse, seek help in reporting, and get support for healing.
One organization I've seen that provides this expertise is https://ministrysafe.com/ They have some great short videos about this issue on their site as well at https://ministrysafe.com/who-we-are/
By Laura Shamblin, MD FAAP
Most of us have now heard of the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study published by Drs. Felitti and Anda in the American Journal of Preventative Medicine in May of 1998. The study and many follow up studies have shown a direct and dose dependent relationship between adverse childhood experiences, or abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction, and adult risky behaviors and health outcomes. As a Pediatrician and advocate for Trauma Informed Care, I’d like to take this opportunity to address some of the objections to screening for ACEs that I have come across. It is true that some areas of research are still emerging, such as protocols, but in other ways we are twenty years behind using the information we have to make a positive difference in our patients lives and in training new physicians to be more comfortable addressing social and experiential determinants of health.
Myth #1 People don’t want to talk about their personal or family traumas.
In several studies, the vast majority of patients did not mind answering a screening tool at a primary care visit. (1,2) Clinics who have adopted ACEs have found using a cover page with a short explanation of the relationship between childhood traumas and adult health outcomes to be helpful. It has also helped to have ACEs screening papers given to the patient to be filled out either at home before the visit, or in a private patient room before seeing the doctor rather than in the public waiting room. Any adoption of a new screening tool should ideally have input from a patient advisory group before implementation to account for concerns of different patient populations. (3)
Myth #2 Filling out a questionnaire may cause someone to remember suppressed memories of childhood abuse and have a sudden onset or worsening of mental health issues.
This concern has been brought up in a couple of published articles (4), however there are many more articles recording the use of ACEs screening tools in various outpatient settings without reference to this situation actually happening. The ACEs questionnaire has also been given and shown to many, many large audiences at conferences and trainings and again, there has never been a case brought to light of any major mental health consequences, to my knowledge. On the contrary, many people express appreciation and even relief to learn the associations between childhood experiences and adult behaviors and health outcomes. They know there is a problem, and it is helpful to put a name to it and therefore be able to get more information about treatment and recovery steps that can be taken. There is mention of patients being uncomfortable with the information on health outcomes being given without being accompanied by information on resilience, buffering, and positive and compensatory experiences. (5)
Myth #3 There aren’t any truly evidence-based interventions for childhood trauma. We shouldn’t make families aware of the negative health outcomes, because there is nothing proven to help them.
This assumes that all positive screens will need a behavioral health care referral. In a large study of 3 community pediatric clinics in the Chicago area, screening for ACEs only resulted in referral for mental health care in 2% of patients. (6) In a feasibility study in a family medicine practice including adults, no new referrals were made. (1) When those services are needed, there are several modalities of treatment that have good evidence for use in children and are recommended by the AAP. At the top of the list would be Trauma-Focused CBT followed by PCIT and CPP. TBRI is also a growing modality with good results among the adoption community and schools but less research funding nationally. More information about treatment modalities can be found here. https://www.traumainformedmd.com/treatments.html#/
For the many who do not need a referral, parenting resources such as local parenting classes (check with churches, hospitals, and pregnancy centers), as well as anticipatory guidance and education provided by the physician, is likely the most helpful resource and is the most asked for by parents. There is growing evidence that positive experiences in childhood as well as healthy attachment relationships with at least one adult both have a buffering effect on children who experience multiple ACEs. These positive experiences and relationships provide resilience as well as support for healing. (7,8)
Myth #4 There aren’t enough mental health professionals available to provide follow up for all of the positive screens we would get, so it’s better to just not ask the questions.
Behavioral health providers who use evidence-based methods of treatment for childhood trauma may be more available than most providers are aware. If you know the modality you would like to be used such as TF-CBT or CPP it is possible to use several search methods to find the nearest provider to your community. Links to these search sites are listed on the Treatments page of www.TraumaInformedMD.com here https://www.traumainformedmd.com/treatments.html#/. SAMHSA also has a search function you can find here https://findtreatment.samhsa.gov/ and most state Mental Health Departments also have search capabilities and resource lists. Another helpful search website is https://www.psychologytoday.com/us which has a way to filter for therapists that provide different modalities or types of therapy. By searching, you can quickly find what behavioral health resources may be near you, even in a rural location.
Myth #5 If we ask about abuse, we may uncover events that would fall under the mandatory reporting obligation. We may overwhelm the Child Protective Services and kids may be removed from the home who didn’t need to be, further traumatizing them.
First of all, if a child is in an unsafe situation there should be no problem with reporting it, despite the time and effort it may require from the provider. However, situations that are serious enough to involve your local Child Protective Services will be evaluated for safety and many of them will not require removal from the home, but they will give the family the opportunity to receive prevention services. The Family First Prevention Services Act is a federal law that was put into effect on October 1st, 2019. It allows state human services agencies to use federal matching money that was previously only used for out-of-home foster care to be used for preventions services given to the family with the child remaining in the home. This law requires some benchmarks in quality to be reached before using it and most states have not put it into effect yet, however, the national trend is changing toward keeping children in the home and providing services to the biological family when possible. (11)
Myth #6 I’d love to screen for ACEs but there is no way I have time during a patient visit to delve into those issues.
In most feasibility studies, practices have found that using a deidentified screening tool – one that just has the patient list the number of ACEs that are positive for them but not specify which ones – allows the physician to talk to them generally about being intermediate or high risk and what they can do to counteract those factors, rather than needing to hear the story of each one. Of course, if a patient wants to explain a positive answer, this may happen and opens the relationship to be a safe space for talking about these issues at this and future visits. When a deidentified screener was used, the time added to most visits was found to be 5 minutes or less in multiple studies. (1,9)
Myth #7 As a doctor, my focus is on my patients’ health, and knowing how many ACEs they have will not affect my diagnosis and treatment of current health issues.
The number of ACEs may not affect a specific diagnosis directly because there are other genetic and resilience factors that also play a role for each individual. However, universal screening makes it more likely that an environment or history of childhood trauma will come to your attention as you are treating chronic illnesses that have been shown to have direct correlations with childhood trauma and toxic stress, such as failure to thrive, asthma, obesity, ADHD, anxiety/depression, substance use, self-harm, and even things like syncope, headaches and chronic abdominal pain. ACEs are present in families of all socioeconomic backgrounds and you may fail to ask about such influences if the family appears to be well-functioning in your clinic.
I’d like to specifically point out the relationship between ACEs and ADHD diagnosis. Patients seem to have a dose dependent relationship between number of ACEs and likelihood of ADHD diagnosis. (10,12) It is also known that one symptom of PTSD is hypervigilance, which in a child includes behaviors such as inattention, inability to sit still, and other behaviors that mimic those of ADHD. Because the DSM-V does not allow for an ADHD diagnosis if another mental health disorder may explain the symptoms, it seems that a screening for ACEs and PTSD may be warranted in any person being screened for ADHD to further inform the diagnosis. As Guanfacine is an accepted treatment for both PTSD symptoms of hypervigilance and ADHD, it is logical that it may be a better first line treatment for a child with both ACEs and ADHD than a stimulant would be. Further research on this and elucidation of protocols are still being worked on.
Myth # 8 The ACEs screen was developed for adults and should not be used on children.
Depending on your purpose there may be value in screening both parents and children. In the case of parents there is some evidence that increased ACEs are related to developmental delays in their children. Surprisingly, there was even a stronger relationship between fathers’ ACEs and children’s developmental delays. (13) This would suggest that screening parents early on may be a way of knowing which to refer for more supports in parenting such as parenting classes or adult mental health services. Early adopters have suggested the 4-month well check visit as being a good time to screen as there are fewer other concerns at that visit. (3) Screening children, either having parents report for young children or having older children report for themselves, would be most helpful for reference when working up health and mental health conditions as stated above such as asthma, failure to thrive, ADHD, etc. These could be done either at well checks and referred back to during illness or could be done at times of work-up for these chronic conditions.
Given the many demands on physicians’ time and paperwork requirements it can be easy to be so busy in our practices that we wait for government or professional organization mandates to dictate how we practice. I hope this helps to bring some resources and research to the forefront to help us use the information that ACEs screening would provide. We should NOT be screening if we are not comfortable with what we will do with the information. And what we will do is usually just have a conversation with the caregiver or patient about the results and things they can do to combat the effects of ACEs on their child, such as getting parenting support, keeping mom healthy, trying to have high quality, safe childcare, trying out things like mindfulness and exercise in the home, leaning on extended family and friends at times of stress, coordinating with teachers, etc. Of course, we will need to have mental health professionals in place that we can refer to when needed. For help with that look back at Myth #4.
The State of California has put together a short online training for physicians and other healthcare or mental health workers to learn more about ACEs and implementing ACEs screening in the medical setting. I just did this training myself and I was impressed at how many references they include with the research and how much of the biology and physiology of stress was included. I received 2 hours of CME credit and 2 hours of MOC credit for the American Board of Pediatrics. This is the training that is being required of California physicians before they can bill for Medicaid reimbursement of administering ACEs screens. However, any healthcare provider can create a login and take the course for free. I appreciated the inclusion of the screening tools and an algorithm for how to interpret results and when referrals are recommended. Please take a look if you are a healthcare provider. It will be worth your time!
You can find it at https://www.acesaware.org/
The National Center on Safe Supportive Learning Environments has a few free online learning tools to help teachers and school administrators to learn the basics of trauma informed schools and to collaborate with their local colleagues in how to implement trauma sensitive changes in their schools. I took a quick look at them and it looked like the ones labeled Understanding Trauma and Its Impacts and Building Trauma Sensitive Schools would be best for classroom teachers. I just wanted to point out this free national resource as many are looking for tools to help with this.
Here is the LINK.
When we talk about counteracting the outcomes of childhood trauma, most of us have heard of resilience. Resilience is something that is determined both by the child, based on aptitudes and personality, and by the environment and relationships. Something you may not have heard of yet is the science of hope. When I think of hope, I personally think of spiritual connotations. But in Hope Rising, How The Science Of Hope Can Change Your Life by Casey Gwinn, J.D. and Chan Hellman, Ph.D., I learned about the relatively new science of hope. Did you know that hope can be measured? At the Hope Research Center at the University of Oklahoma in Tulsa, Dr. Hellman leads a team of researchers who have developed a screening tool to measure hope in both children and adults. The Hope Score is then predictive of outcomes in the short term and long term. And not just the current score is important, but whether or not a person’s score rises over time. Once we understand the science of hope and how to build it in others, we can then use it to develop activities or conversations in our circle of influence to help ourselves and others increase in hope. Rising hope is desirable to all of us but it is especially something needed by those who have been affected by childhood trauma. Hope can counteract feelings like shame and apathy that often accompany childhood trauma. If you are interested in helping yourself or others in pretty much any area of life, Hope Rising will be an interesting and helpful read. There is a lot of information packed into this book, but it is helpfully broken down into very short chapters with anecdotal stories to illustrate the concepts at the beginning of each chapter. Many of these stories relate to the authors, making it read like a memoir at times. For me this brings in the human element and makes the science more captivating. I read a lot of both fiction and nonfiction and I usually read straight through a book. For this book, I found myself wanting to read a chapter or two a day and then think about it before going on. I also want to say that my favorite chapters came at the end, those on spirituality, the workplace, and leaving a legacy of hope. So, I encourage you to finish the book, as the end is worth it. There is something in Hope Rising for everyone, whether you have experienced grief, cancer, abuse, domestic violence, workplace harassment, or spiritual crisis, or you work with those who have, you will find helpful information that can be applied in conversations or activities with others. As someone interested in helping communities and families counteract the generational effects of childhood trauma, this book is one of the staples for understanding how to help. The concepts can be applied in one-on-one relationships, as well as in large organizations. Currently in Oklahoma, the State Department for Human Services is rolling out training for their staff, using Hope Rising, to help staff relate to our citizens in ways that raise hope. Speaking of hope, that is something that raises my hope for future generations in our state!
by Laura Shamblin, MD
You may not have heard yet about the change in federal law that allows states to use federal matching dollars to pay for child abuse prevention services for biological families rather than solely for foster care services after the child has been removed from the home. This law was included in a large omnibus funding bill and so did not get a lot of notice, but nationally it is a huge change in perspective for how we have been dealing with families and children. There is much evidence that the removal of a child from her parent is a trauma similar to the trauma of abuse or neglect. If we can prevent families from descending into this level of dysfunction by providing mental health, drug abuse services and parenting support, we should be able to prevent this type of childhood trauma on a large scale. If you'd like to hear more about the new law, how it works, and my personal take on why it is needed you can listen HERE.
Laura Shamblin, MD
One of the best uses of TraumaInformedMD.com is to find out information about types of mental health treatments and to find mental health providers. The list of mental health resources was getting a bit long for the Healthcare page, so I decided to create a new page for only mental health resources in Oklahoma. It is listed as OK-Mental Health at the top of the website. If you live in another state there are still ways to search for resources in your state on the Treatments page. If you live in Oklahoma, this is a more comprehensive list and some search options which are great! These resources are helpful for patients, family members, and physicians as we try to find places to refer to that are close to our patients.
I am SO excited to share with you that TraumaInformedMD.com is opening an online store that will carry customized, printed-to-order, items that are specific to childhood adversity, resilience, foster care, and adoption. There will also be some more general items that anyone would love. Please take a look at what we have and share with your friends. These will make great gifts! The proceeds from the store will help me to continue to do the work of sharing this important information for free!
The Summer has been a busy one for me. I stay at home with 4 children most of the time, so summer means I am in full-time mom mode. I do work some evenings and weekends so I am still active as a Pediatrician. This summer I had the privilege of doing a few foster parent continuing education workshops with the Oklahoma Baptist Homes for Children. I was also surprised and honored to be appointed by our governor to the Board of Directors or the Oklahoma Healthcare Authority. Everyone asks me what the Healthcare Authority does, and I answer that they are basically in charge of all Medicaid money that the state spends through itself and 4 other agencies. The money that our state spends is matched by federal money, which requires us to be sure we are following all of the federal regulations on top of state laws. So far, I've done a lot of reviewing agency rules before we pass them to be sure they are clear and necessary. I enjoy the work and it is a volunteer position.
This summer, my husband and I also went through The HALO Project with our 6 year old daughter. This amazing program is based on TBRI principles. It provides 10 weeks of training and support to both parents while the children get to learn new skills in self regulation, and other skills needed by children from hard places, with a buddy working one-on-one. It is a great program because it provides so much help in a short period of time. It is also great because both parents are involved. I know from experience that one parent can have all the knowledge, but it will not work until both parents use it with consistency and support of each other. For more information on this see http://www.haloprojectokc.org/.
So I've been a little slow at getting updates out over the summer. Things are starting to pick up, though, with showings of the Resilience Film, which I sometimes get to serve on a discussion panel afterwards, conferences, and another foster parent training coming up. I hope to do a training with my church's children's workers soon and am developing that. I also plan to go back through all new research that has come out in the last few months for updated information I can share. Stay tuned!
The first is from The Karyn Purvis Institute of Child Development at TCU which is known for developing TBRI, Trust Based Relational Intervention, as a tool for working with children from hard places. TBRI principles focus on helping the child feel safe and connected to their caregiver so that they can focus on learning. This link is for a list of TBRI resources including videos and printables that you will find helpful in preparing for the school year. LINK
The second resource is Sesame Street in Communities. You definitely want to explore their website under the topics tab for videos, activities, and printables on many subjects like resilience, emotions, families, moving your body, math, literacy, foster care, and more. LINK
The third resource is a new online training compiled by a therapist who is trained by Bruce Perry's Child Trauma Academy and has spent the last few years training teachers in how to work with the most difficult students. It's called Trauma Camp. If you are interested in going further than your school district is currently providing in training this is a great resource for you to do on your own or with a small group of teachers. LINK
Lastly, don't forget to check out the Schools page of TraumaInformedMD.com for many more resources that you may be looking for. Don't forget to share this resource with your principles and colleagues. LINK
Have a Blessed Summer!
Laura Shamblin, MD